I totally agree that privacy controls are necessary but at what stage will you require a PhD to "configure" your social network settings. What happened to the days of "Public" and "Private"? Yes - I would like to show my photos to everyone No - I only want people that I have approved to be my friend to see my photos. Now Facebook gives you the option to control what your family, friends, classmates, colleagues and church groups see of your profile. Wow - overload! Google Buzz took a step further and just threw all your email contacts into the Buzz pot causing worlds to collide!
Well here's the alternative - Separate all your social groups into different networks. That'll save you from accidentally exposing your party photos to your boss and worse. We already do our best to ensure that our various social groups in our life are largely separate. One overarching network to rule them all? That's like putting all your ex-girlfriends in the room with your wife and kids and then having your work colleagues around to spectate. I think FacebookFail does a great job of highlighting what happens when these social groups collide... particularly when broadcasting uncensored, off-the-cuff remarks.
Consider how the following Social Networks can neatly be categorised with each adopting a particular tone, rules of appropriateness and clear guidelines of what is acceptable behaviour:
- Social Networks for Pet Owners
- Family Friendly Social Networks
- Social Networks for Religious Groups
- Social Networks for Professionals

2 comments:
This is not a clear cut issue that can be resolved just by separating into different networks.
Your colleagues in office may well be your uni schoolmate, as well as your bowling buddy. Maintaining multiple accounts can be impossible, if not very tiring.
Worse case, what if your colleague/boss wants to "friend" you in the network? Do you say yes? Or do you say "work only"? How much details do we add?
"Work only, but play bowling occasionally. Definitely not close enough to recommend his character, etc".
"Oh! So, we are ONLY 'colleagues'?" can derailed a perfectly fine working relationship!
I must confess that when I found out FB will show updates based on the level of "friendship", I've went to those whom's updates I'm not getting, and see if they are not updating, or whether I'm just on their restricted list!
Potential stalker alert I know! But I plead that it is my natural old journalistic curiosity at work. :)
I, too, do not have an answer for what is the best way to resolve it (if I have, FB will hear from me and pay me millions!). But I hope some bright spark out there will eventually do!
Maybe Mostyle will be the one. ;)
@Louis - True, there probably will be *some* overlap across social groups.
The point I was trying to make was that the growing complexity of assigning specific privacy attributes to individual input/output within a social network can be problematic.. potentially spelling the death knell of one behemoth social network in order to open the doors for migration to *another* social network.
My personal migratory path has taken me from BBS's (when I ran a BBS from my bedroom during highschool in the early 90's) to AsianAvenue.com (the first chat website that had a pop-out chat box that I encountered) to ICQ, then MSN and then Facebook, Mixi and LinkedIn (oh.. and Sandbox.. cause I've got all these fans in the Philippines now of course :).
But I digress.. Regarding your example of "how to reject your boss on an SNS".. I think you just need to deal with it like any other social situation - be a man, cave in or lie! You could always direct them to your ICQ account that you never log into :)
Post a Comment